Matching Grant Challenge
BruceMatch
We’re slowly making headway in our annual fund drive, but not nearly fast enough to meet our make-or-break goal.  On the bright side, a generous CounterPuncher has stepped forward with a pledge to match every donation of $100 or more. Any of you out there thinking of donating $50 should know that if you donate a further $50, CounterPunch will receive an additional $100. And if you plan to send us $200 or $500 or more, he will give CounterPunch a matching $200 or $500 or more. Don’t miss the chance. Double your clout right now. Please donate.
 unnamed

Yes, these are dire political times. Many who optimistically hoped for real change have spent nearly five years under the cold downpour of political reality. Here at CounterPunch we’ve always aimed to tell it like it is, without illusions or despair. That’s why so many of you have found a refuge at CounterPunch and made us your homepage. You tell us that you love CounterPunch because the quality of the writing you find here in the original articles we offer every day and because we never flinch under fire. We appreciate the support and are prepared for the fierce battles to come.

Unlike other outfits, we don’t hit you up for money every month … or even every quarter. We ask only once a year. But when we ask, we mean it.

CounterPunch’s website is supported almost entirely by subscribers to the print edition of our magazine. We aren’t on the receiving end of six-figure grants from big foundations. George Soros doesn’t have us on retainer. We don’t sell tickets on cruise liners. We don’t clog our site with deceptive corporate ads.

The continued existence of CounterPunch depends solely on the support and dedication of our readers. We know there are a lot of you. We get thousands of emails from you every day. Our website receives millions of hits and nearly 100,000 readers each day. And we don’t charge you a dime.

Please, use our brand new secure shopping cart to make a tax-deductible donation to CounterPunch today or purchase a subscription our monthly magazine and a gift sub for someone or one of our explosive  books, including the ground-breaking Killing Trayvons. Show a little affection for subversion: consider an automated monthly donation. (We accept checks, credit cards, PayPal and cold-hard cash….)

pp1

or
cp-store

To contribute by phone you can call Becky or Deva toll free at: 1-800-840-3683

Thank you for your support,

Jeffrey, Joshua, Becky, Deva, and Nathaniel

CounterPunch
 PO Box 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Normally even tempered, a ten-foot komodo dragon in the LA Zoo caused bouts of schadenfreude (German, meaning malicious glee in the discomfiture of others) in every newsroom in California over the weekend by savagely attacking Phil Bronstein’s big toe. This same Bronstein is the husband of Sharon Stone. He also edits the Hearst-owned San Francisco […]

Hell Hath No Fury Like A Dragon Scorned

by Alexander Cockburn And Jeffrey St. Clair

Normally even tempered, a ten-foot komodo dragon in the LA Zoo caused bouts of schadenfreude (German, meaning malicious glee in the discomfiture of others) in every newsroom in California over the weekend by savagely attacking Phil Bronstein’s big toe. This same Bronstein is the husband of Sharon Stone. He also edits the Hearst-owned San Francisco Chronicle. Back in 1993 when Bronstein was editing the San Francisco Examiner, (then owned by the Hearsts before they switched papers) Bronstein cost the Hearsts $600,000 in damages for breaking the ankle of a political consultant called Clint Reilly. The two got into a tussle in the office of Will Hearst and Bronstein, a macho type, had the better of the engagement. Reilly sued and got his $600,000.

Possibly the komodo dragon, a species of Indonesian lizard, was aware of this episode when Bronstein entered its cage in the company of a zookeeper, and was intent on evening up the score. Or maybe it was angry because Sharon Stone stayed outside the cage. It seems Stone was treating her husband to the intimate session with the dragon as an early father’s day gift.

Bronstein wasn’t wearing any shoes because the zookeeper said that the komodo is fed white rats and the keeper feared it might mistake Bronstein’s white sneakers for its normal snack. Confronted with Bronstein’s white, bare and possibly unfragrant feet the komodo sank its razor sharp, serrated teeth into the editor’s big toe. Bronstein managed to prize its jaws open, salvage his foot and make good his escape. The komodo made a serious mess of Bronstein’s foot and there are fears that the dragon’s dirty teeth may infect Bronstein; but what about the effect of Bronstein’s foot on the komodo?

Beyond this, there is the issue of what the LA Zoo was doing, allowing a bigwig couple like Stone and Bronstein have a private session du cote de chez komodo. ” We have a number of celebrities who want to go behind the scenes and he had a fondness for these dragons, according to his wife,” zoo spokeswoman Lora LaMarca told Reuters in the wake of the komodo’s pododic escapade. But why should the rare species have these “special visits” inflicted on them? It may well be that after repeated visitations by Hollywood stars, foreign dignitaries and the like, the komodo, confronted by Bronstein’s naked feet, decided to take a stand. CP