Annual Fundraising Appeal
Over the course of 21 years, we’ve published many unflattering stories about Henry Kissinger. We’ve recounted his involvement in the Chilean coup and the illegal bombings of Cambodia and Laos; his hidden role in the Kent State massacre and the genocide in East Timor; his noxious influence peddling in DC and craven work for dictators and repressive regimes around the world. We’ve questioned his ethics, his morals and his intelligence. We’ve called for him to be arrested and tried for war crimes. But nothing we’ve ever published pissed off HK quite like this sequence of photos taken at a conference in Brazil, which appeared in one of the early print editions of CounterPunch.
100716HenryKissingerNosePicking
The publication of those photos, and the story that went with them, 20 years ago earned CounterPunch a global audience in the pre-web days and helped make our reputation as a fearless journal willing to take the fight to the forces of darkness without flinching. Now our future is entirely in your hands. Please donate.

Day12Fixed

Yes, these are dire political times. Many who optimistically hoped for real change have spent nearly five years under the cold downpour of political reality. Here at CounterPunch we’ve always aimed to tell it like it is, without illusions or despair. That’s why so many of you have found a refuge at CounterPunch and made us your homepage. You tell us that you love CounterPunch because the quality of the writing you find here in the original articles we offer every day and because we never flinch under fire. We appreciate the support and are prepared for the fierce battles to come.

Unlike other outfits, we don’t hit you up for money every month … or even every quarter. We ask only once a year. But when we ask, we mean it.

CounterPunch’s website is supported almost entirely by subscribers to the print edition of our magazine. We aren’t on the receiving end of six-figure grants from big foundations. George Soros doesn’t have us on retainer. We don’t sell tickets on cruise liners. We don’t clog our site with deceptive corporate ads.

The continued existence of CounterPunch depends solely on the support and dedication of our readers. We know there are a lot of you. We get thousands of emails from you every day. Our website receives millions of hits and nearly 100,000 readers each day. And we don’t charge you a dime.

Please, use our brand new secure shopping cart to make a tax-deductible donation to CounterPunch today or purchase a subscription our monthly magazine and a gift sub for someone or one of our explosive  books, including the ground-breaking Killing Trayvons. Show a little affection for subversion: consider an automated monthly donation. (We accept checks, credit cards, PayPal and cold-hard cash….)
cp-store

or use
pp1

To contribute by phone you can call Becky or Deva toll free at: 1-800-840-3683

Thank you for your support,

Jeffrey, Joshua, Becky, Deva, and Nathaniel

CounterPunch
 PO Box 228, Petrolia, CA 95558

Blair's Deadly Double Standard

New Labor, New Bombs

by Tariq Ali

As the future ripens in the past, so the past rots in the present. American leaders have long been used to treating the cracked British vase as a pisspot, but Attlee and Wilson, while dutifully kissing ass in the White House, did , at least, attempt to restrict and restrain the United States, albeit with little success. Blair and Cook and the rest of this dreadful gang seem to be only too delighted with any new opportunity to bark their support for the imperial war-monger in the White House, bombing Baghdad to show his toughness to electors at home and recalcitrants abroad. Blair’s argument that the new bombing was necessary to protect the lives of British pilots is incredible.

What the hell are these pilots doing in Iraq in the first place? Why have they been bombing Iraq for the last ten years? Over the last two years alone, the USA and Britain have dropped over 400 tons of bombs and missiles on Iraq. Blair has been raining down deadly explosives at a rate twenty times greater than Major. No other country in Europe supports this fire-storm. The bombardment of Iraq has now lasted longer than the US invasion of Vietnam. Blair, Cook and the entire Government are so used to the stench of their own hypocrisy that they can justify anything. No doubt Lord Macdonald will soon be telling viewers that the bombing raids were necessary to defend the democratic rights of the military-industrial complex to maximise profits, without which nothing can work and, therefore, if we want a better system of privatized transport in Britain we must understand the bombs are necessary. The brazen opportunism of New Labour culture appears to be reflected in the Labour Party as a whole and has affected its capacity to think critically.

The orthodox casuistry among loyal columnists and courtiers is to justify inconvenient realities-Israeli possession of nuclear weapons and colonial brutalities inflicted on the Palestinians, Turkish oppression of the Kurds, the clerical dictatorship in Saudi Arabia, etc.-with a breathtaking cynicism. Thus Blair’s Personal Assistant for Foreign Affairs, ex-diplomat Robert Cooper writes in his book of The Post-Modern State and the World Order” that: “We need to get used to the idea of double standards.” He also informs us casually that “the reasons for fighting the Gulf War were not that Iraq had violate the norms of international behaviour”, but the need for the West to keep a tight grip on “vital oil supplies.”

Together with the bombing, the sanctions regime kept in place by Clinton and Blair ands now Bush and Blair, has cost the lives of, taking the lowest estimate, 300,000 children. As the jets take off again for yet another bombing raid on the shattered and famished remnants of a Third World Country, why is the Labour Party so silent. A country mobilized for war by shameless demagogy can in a more disillusioned mood become vulnerable to other and more consistent demagogues. Dissent that refuses to be a spectator, but insists on wedging itself into the forbidden zones of modern politics is vital as a physic for any functioning democracy.

Dissent in Britain has become atomized. It reflects a hostility to all traditional politics and is confined to single-issues related to the environmental and animal rights. Most of these deserve support and yet something was missing. I wonder whether those who were extremely upset a few years ago by the cramped living conditions in which calves were shipped to slaughter-houses in France ever spared a thought for the number of children who died in Iraq from malnutrition and lack of medicine as a direct result of the inhuman sanctions policy imposed by Washington and London. Time to wake-up. CP